A Comparative Study of the Role of Notarial Offices in Regulating the Registration of Movable Property Transactions

Authors

    Mohammadjavad Norozi Department of Law, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
    Soosan Narimani * Department of Islamic Studies, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran. soosan.narimani@iau.ac.ir
    Akram Tajik Department of Law, Az.C., Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr, Iran.

Keywords:

Notarial offices, Movable property, Transaction registration, Comparative study, Iranian law, French law, German law

Abstract

Movable property, due to its transferability and rapid circulation, constitutes a significant portion of private and commercial assets and plays a central role in economic transactions. Despite this importance, the lack of a comprehensive registration system for movable property transactions in Iranian law has led to frequent ownership conflicts, multiple transfers, and evidentiary disputes. In this context, notarial offices, as public institutions with legal authority and probative credibility, possess the potential to organize and stabilize movable property transactions. This study adopts a descriptive–analytical and comparative approach to examine the role of notarial offices in the registration of movable property transactions in Iranian law, while comparing it with the legal systems of France and Germany. The findings indicate that although official deeds in Iran enjoy strong evidentiary value, their effects in movable property transactions are largely confined to the contractual relationship between the parties and lack a public disclosure function. By contrast, French and German law integrate notarial offices into broader institutional frameworks that link official deeds with public or specialized registries, thereby ensuring transparency, legal certainty, and protection of third parties. The study concludes that enhancing the role of notarial offices in Iran does not require excessive formalism, but rather a redefinition of their institutional function and a structural connection between official deeds and registration or information systems. Such an approach can significantly reduce legal disputes and improve transactional security in the field of movable property.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benabent, A. (2019). Droit civil: Les biens (14th Edition ed.). LexisNexis.

Carbonnier, J. (2004). Droit civil: Les biens (19th Edition ed.). Presses Universitaires de France.

Emami, S. H. (2016). Civil Law (48th Edition ed., Vol. Volume 2). Eslamiyeh Publications.

Jafari Langarudi, M. J. (2011). Legal Terminology (25th Edition ed.). Ganj-e Danesh Library.

Katabi, H. G. (2019). Property and Ownership in Iranian Law. Dadgostar Publishing.

Medicus, D., & Petersen, J. (2018). Allgemeiner Teil des BGB (11th Edition ed.). C.F. Müller.

Palandt, O. (2021). Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (80th Edition ed.). C.H. Beck.

Safaei, S. H. (2020). Civil Law: Persons and Property (17th Edition ed.). SAMT Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

Submitted

2025-09-24

Revised

2026-01-15

Accepted

2026-01-18

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Norozi, M. ., Narimani, S., & Tajik , A. . (1405). A Comparative Study of the Role of Notarial Offices in Regulating the Registration of Movable Property Transactions. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-15. https://www.jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/475

Similar Articles

1-10 of 258

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.