Judicial System for Compensation Arising from Legislation in the Islamic Republic of Iran

Authors

    Bizhan Abbasi * Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran babbasi@ut.ac.ir
    Reza Tajarlou Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
    Farnaz Manooei Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

: Administrative Justice Court, Civil Liability, Enactments, Integrated Adjudication, Legislative Damages, Separate Adjudication

Abstract

Recognition of the specific characteristics of legislative and quasi-legislative liability alongside traditional civil liability constitutes the desirable adjudicative system for damages arising from legislation. Although governmental civil liability and legislative liability share certain common features, the distinct focus and emphasis placed upon them demonstrate that legislative damages cannot be fully addressed through ordinary civil law rules and the application of the three traditional elements required for establishing liability. The emerging approach in the field of legislative damages is the integrated adjudication model. Under this model, legislative damages are primarily examined through specialized public law rules and doctrines. Nevertheless, the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which continues to rely predominantly on its traditional civil law framework for adjudicating compensation claims in the sphere of public law, follows a bifurcated and two-stage adjudicative system through the Administrative Court of Justice and the general courts. Furthermore, regulations and enactments issued by certain authorities and institutions face a legal vacuum regarding the examination and compensation of damages. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this article seeks to answer the question of whether the existing adjudicative system and the mechanisms embedded within the legal structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran are capable of addressing legislative and quasi-legislative damages. The findings indicate that the exempt status of certain enactments, the two-stage nature of these proceedings, the absence of specialized foundations for establishing legislative damages, and the failure to utilize the judicial capacities of the country have resulted in the marginalization of such claims. Accordingly, the establishment of a coherent legal regime and a unified judicial authority overseeing legislative damages, through reliance on the integrated adjudication model, as well as the creation of a dedicated compensation fund and budgetary allocation for the full recovery of damages, is of considerable importance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abeyratne, R. (2019). Ordinary Wrongs as Constitutional Rights: The Public Law Model of Torts in South Asia. Texas International Law Journal, 1-30.

Aboelazm, K. S. (2024). Supreme Constitutional Court Review of the Legislative Omission in Egypt in Light of International Experiences. Heliyon, 39.

Aghaei Togh, M. (2017). A Comparative View of the Jurisdiction of the General Board of the Administrative Court of Justice Regarding the Annulment of Regulations. Judicial Legal Views, 22(79-80), 1-22.

Amid Zanjani, A., & Mousazadeh, E. (2010). Supervision over Governmental Acts and Administrative Justice. University of Tehran Press.

Asadi Ojagh, N., Shirazi, M. M., & Hasanvand, M. (2024). The Administrative Court of Justice: Drawing the Duality of Iran's Judicial System. Research and Development in Public Law, 1(1), 85-109.

Asimow, M. (2015). Five Models of Administrative Adjudication. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 63(1), 3-31.

Bell, J., & Lichere, F. State Liability. In Contemporary French Administrative Law (pp. 239).

Cafaggi, F., & Iamiceli, P. (2017). The Principles of Effectiveness, Proportionality and Dissuasiveness in the Enforcement of EU Consumer Law: The Impact of a Triad on the Choice of Civil Remedies and Administrative Sanction. European Review of Private Law, 575-618.

Cherednychenko, O. O. (2021). Regulatory Agencies and Private Damages in the EU: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. Yearbook of European Law, 146-171.

Della Cananea, G. (2020). A Common Core Research on Government Liability in Tort: A Comparative Introduction. In Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws: The Common Core of European Administrative Law (pp. 87-107). Oxford University Press.

Della Cananea, G., & Caranta, R. (2020). Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws: The Common Core of European Administrative Law. Oxford University Press.

Ghazi, A. (2005). Essentials of Constitutional Law. Mizan Publications.

Karimi, A., & Rezaeinejad, H. (2012). Separating the Judicial Jurisdiction of Specialized Authorities from Public Courts in Hearing Civil Liability Claims against Municipal Officials. Private Law Journal, 9(1), 5-34.

Marboe, I. (2011). State Responsibility and Comparative State Liability for Administrative and Legislative Harm to Economic Interests. In International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (pp. 378). Oxford University Press.

Morrison, F. L. (1998). The Liability of Governments for Legislative Acts in the United States of America. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 531-548.

Najjarzadeh Hanjani, M. (2023). Administrative Law 1 and 2 (5 ed.). Durandishan Publications.

Perroud, T. (2020). Government Liability in France: A Special Regime under General Principles. In Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws (pp. 1-209). Oxford University Press.

Rosenthal, L. (2007). A Theory of Government Damages Liability: Torts, Constitutional Torts, and Taking. 1-74.

Rostami, V., & Ayineh Negini, H. (2025). Judicial Review of Regulations Issued by the Head of the Judiciary. Administrative Law Quarterly, 12(43), 77-95.

Sadeghi, E., Ostvar Sangari, K., Shojalyan, K., & Farokhi, Z. (2023). State Civil Liability Arising from Regulation. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 4, 89-100.

Saleh, R. A., & Farhat, M. H. (2021). Legal Basis for State Liability for Compensation for Acts of Government. European Journal of Management, Economics and Business, 214-229.

Shahniaei, A. (2013). Civil Liability of Governmental Agencies Arising from the Enactment of Unlawful Regulations: An Inquiry into a Unification Judgment of the Administrative Court of Justice. Ray Quarterly, 2(1), 71-90.

Szasz, V. (2021). State Immunity in Relation to Damage Caused by Legislation. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies, 113.

Tabatabaei Motameni, M. (2023). Administrative Law (27 ed.). SAMT Publications.

Taleb Ahmadi, H., Rezaei, A., & Naqavi, A. H. (2020). Civil Liability Arising from Breach of Trust in Government Announcements and Decisions. Public Law Knowledge, 9(29), 27-50.

Wroblewski, B. (2023). State Liability and the Law: The Dogma of Lack of Liability for Acts of the Legislator in English Scholarship and Law (1 ed.).

Downloads

Published

2027-10-23

Submitted

2025-03-26

Revised

2025-06-14

Accepted

2025-06-22

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Abbasi, B., Tajarlou, R. . ., & Manooei, F. . . (1406). Judicial System for Compensation Arising from Legislation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-16. https://www.jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/586

Similar Articles

1-10 of 291

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.