Challenges of Default Judgments in Civil Proceedings within the Framework of Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Iranian Law

Abstract

The challenges associated with default judgments in Iranian civil proceedings, viewed through the dual lenses of Imamiyyah jurisprudence and statutory law, constitute a critical issue for ensuring judicial fairness and the protection of litigants’ rights. This article, focusing on Article 303 of the Iranian Civil Procedure Code, analyzes the jurisprudential and legal foundations of issuing a default judgment, as well as the necessary conditions for doing so—including the absence of the defendant, the lack of a written defense, and the absence of actual service of notice. First, the concept of non-appearance in litigation and its limitations within Imamiyyah jurisprudence is examined, clarifying the distinction between provisional decisions and final judgments. Next, the fundamental principles of fair trial and the right to access justice are elaborated, emphasizing their role in preventing violations of the parties’ rights. The article also explores the adversarial principle in adjudication and its significance in ensuring equality and the possibility of defense for both parties, supported by historical review and legal documentation. Furthermore, the study addresses existing ambiguities in the conditions for issuing default judgments, including the requirement of a written defense and actual service of notice, and examines the role of submitting a power of attorney or a counterclaim in removing the label of a default judgment. Finally, the article discusses challenges related to requiring a guarantor or security from the judgment creditor in default judgments and highlights differences between this requirement and established jurisprudential and legal principles. The findings indicate that the overlap between statutory provisions, jurisprudential reasoning, and judicial practice has generated uncertainty in distinguishing between default and adversarial judgments, demonstrating that precise analysis of their conditions and evidentiary foundations is essential for realizing a fair trial.