Comparative Analysis of the Delivery Condition in Marine Bills of Lading under English Law and International Conventions

Authors

    Davood Amini * Department of Private Law, Adalat University, Tehran, Iran amini@Moi.ir
    Ali Mohammad Mokarami Department of Private Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran, Iran.
    Alireza Shamshiri Department of Private Law, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
    Alireza Mazloom Rahni Department of Private Law, ShQ.C., Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e Qods, Iran.

Keywords:

delivery condition, marine bills of lading, English law, international conventions

Abstract

The present study has been conducted with the aim of providing a legal analysis of the delivery condition and examining the strengths and weaknesses of Iran’s domestic laws in the field of maritime carriage. This research seeks to answer the central question of whether a party demanding delivery of goods on the basis of a bill of lading is obligated to comply with the rule of presenting the bill of lading, and how Iran’s domestic laws are aligned with—or divergent from—English law and international regulations. In the theoretical sections, the legal nature of the marine bill of lading as a document with multiple functions—contractual, proprietary, and evidentiary—was examined, and its role in ensuring legal security in international commercial transactions was clarified. Marine bills of lading, as instruments for the transfer of ownership and verification of the lawful holder, in addition to showing the carrier’s undertaking, constitute evidentiary tools in legal disputes. Furthermore, the comparative analysis of Iranian law, English law, and the Hamburg and Rotterdam Conventions demonstrated that the presentation of the bill of lading is a necessary condition for delivery of goods, and failure to observe this requirement results in the carrier’s civil liability. The findings showed that although Iranian law contains foundational provisions, it lacks the necessary clarity regarding negotiable and electronic bills of lading, the scope of carrier liability, and harmonization with documentary credits. The absence of consistent judicial precedent also reduces legal security for economic actors. The comparative analysis further demonstrated that drawing upon the experience of English law and the standards of international conventions can eliminate existing ambiguities and enhance the predictability of maritime transactions. In the recommendations section, proposals were made for amending the Maritime Law, drafting implementing regulations, establishing judicial consistency, harmonizing with banking regulations and documentary credits, enhancing the practical capacity of carriers, and utilizing modern technologies for the issuance and transfer of electronic bills of lading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arbābī, M., & Ḥātamīpūr, N. (2020). Determining the Governing Law on Maritime Bills of Lading by Iranian and English Courts. Journal of Maritime Transport Law Studies.

Berlingieri, F. (2009). The Rotterdam Rules: A Commentary. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Comprehensive Judicial Decisions Database. (2018). Judicial Precedent of Maritime Claims.

Gaskell, N. (2000). Carriage of Goods by Sea in England. Sweet & Maxwell.

Girvin, S. (2011). Shipping Law. Routledge.

Hāshemī, A. (2017). Clauses Restricting the Carrier's Liability in Iranian Law. Iranian Legal and Judicial Journal.

Ja'fari Langaroudi, M. (2019). Maritime Law: Comparative Analysis of the Delivery Clause in the Bill of Lading. Ḥoqūq Publishing.

Kātūziyān, N. (2016). Civil Law: Obligations and Contracts (Vol. 3). Mizan Publishing.

Mahdavī, R. (2022). Iran's Judicial Precedent on Maritime Bills of Lading. Legal and Economic Research.

Naṣīrī, M. (2021). Analysis of Judicial Precedent on Goods Delivery in Negotiable Bills of Lading. Allameh Tabataba'i University Press.

Ṣadr, M. (2019). Conformity of Iran's Domestic Law with International Standards in Maritime Transport Law. International Law Journal.

Scrutton, J. (2019). Scrutton on Charterparties and Bills of Lading. Sweet & Maxwell.

Sturley, M. (2004). International Maritime Transport Law. Kluwer Law International.

Ṭāherī, S. (2020). Investigating the Nature of the Maritime Bill of Lading with Emphasis on Governing Laws and Regulations on the Delivery of Goods. International Trade Law Journal.

Tetley, W. (2008). International Maritime and Admiralty Law. Editions Yvon Blais.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

Submitted

2025-07-24

Revised

2025-12-08

Accepted

2025-12-14

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Amini, D., Mokarami, A. M. . ., Shamshiri, A. . ., & Mazloom Rahni, A. . (1405). Comparative Analysis of the Delivery Condition in Marine Bills of Lading under English Law and International Conventions. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law. https://www.jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/441

Similar Articles

1-10 of 240

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.