Civil and Legal Liability of Artificial Intelligence in International Commercial Transactions
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Civil Liability, International Commercial Transactions, Autonomous Agents, Strict Liability, Electronic Legal Personhood, UNCITRALAbstract
With the increasing penetration of artificial intelligence systems into the process of concluding and performing international commercial contracts, the traditional concepts of “will” and “agency” have faced a fundamental challenge. The main objective of this study is to explain the foundations of civil and legal liability arising from the harmful acts of autonomous agents in the context of international transactions and to identify the person or persons liable within the chain extending from the production to the utilization of this technology. Using a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative approach, this research examines leading international instruments, such as UNCITRAL reports and European Parliament regulations, analyzes models of attribution of liability in different legal systems, and assesses the adaptability of traditional rules of civil liability to the complex nature of artificial intelligence. The findings indicate that classical theories based on “fault” lack sufficient efficacy because claimants are unable to prove human error in machine-learning processes. By contrast, the movement toward “strict liability” or “risk-based liability” has emerged as an equitable solution for protecting injured parties in international trade. Moreover, the idea of granting “electronic legal personality” to artificial intelligence, despite its theoretical appeal, faces serious obstacles in relation to financial guarantees and causation. In international transactions, the divergence of views regarding the determination of the governing law for liability further reveals the necessity of revising conflict-of-laws rules. The results of the study show that, in order to ensure legal certainty in global markets, it is necessary to move beyond individualistic approaches toward systems of “distributed liability” among the developer, owner, and user. It is recommended that, to prevent fragmentation in judicial practice, a comprehensive international convention be developed under the supervision of international institutions, centered on a “mandatory compensation fund” and the formulation of unified technical standards for proving causation in algorithmic systems.
Downloads
References
Abedian, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2012). The Place of Strict Liability in Civil Liability for Bodily Injury and Death. Legal Research, 15(10).
Arab, H. (2018). Legal Effects of Multiple Causes in Accidents. Semnan Police Knowledge Journal, 8(4).
Barikloo, A. R. (2014). Civil Liability. Mizan.
Ghasemzadeh, S. M. (2011). Obligations and Non-Contractual Civil Liability. Mizan.
Ghavamabadi, H. (2024). Settlement of Disputes Arising from Smart Contracts with Emphasis on Blockchain-Based Arbitration University of Tehran].
Harlow, C. (2005). Understanding Tort Law. Sweet & Maxwell.
Hosseinabadi, S., & Zarefard, M. (2022). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Electronic Supervision and Increasing Transparency of Affairs. National Conference on Promoting Transparency,
Karimi, A., & Karimi, S. (2022). New Thoughts in Contract Law. Dadgostar.
Katouzian, N. (2013). Legal Events: Civil Liability. Enteshar.
Keshavarz Safiei, E. (2025). The Basis of Civil Liability of Actors Related to the Operation of Artificial Intelligence Systems in European Union Documents and Iranian Law. Legal Research, 28(4).
Khadem Razavi, G., & Noei. (2015). A Comparative Study of the Foundations of Fault-Based and No-Fault Liability in Iranian and English Civil Liability Law. Gavah Legal Doctrines, 1(1).
Khorrami, Y. (2018). The Status and Validity of Blockchain Smart Contracts from the Perspective of Iranian Contract Law. First International Conference on Knowledge Management, Blockchain, and Economy,
Khorsandian, M. A. (2009). The Place of Benevolence in the Realm of Civil Law Shiraz University].
Lawson, F. H. (1980). Remedies of English Law (2nd ed.).
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1991). Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyyah (Vol. 1). Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib School.
Malakouti, R. (2022). Examining the Elements of Civil Liability in Cyberspace. Cyberspace Legal Studies Quarterly, 1(9).
Najafabadi, O. (2022). Analysis of Blockchain-Based Contracts in Iranian Law University of Isfahan].
Rafiei, E. S. (2024). Challenges and Solutions of E-Commerce Arbitration from the Perspective of the Iranian Legal System. First National Congress on Sustainable Development and Social Responsibilities: Challenges and Solutions,
Rah Chamani, M. (2014). Civil Liability for Loss of Chance in Iranian Law Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University].
Rahpeyk, H. (2016). Civil Liability Law and Remedies. Khorsandi.
Razavi, S. M., & Daemi, M. E. (2024). Civil Liability Arising from Smart Contract Error. Cyberspace Legal Studies, 3(2).
Sarkori, T., Bameri, F., Irandegani, A., Sho'ali Bar, I., & Din Mohammadi, A. (2025). Risks of Artificial Intelligence. Twenty-Second National Conference on Electrical, Computer, and Mechanical Engineering,
Shah Amirian, S. M. (2025). Application of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics in Risk Management and Improving Accounting Transparency in Insurance Companies: A Case Study of Pasargad Insurance Company. Fourth International Congress on Management, Economics, Humanities, and Business Development,
Tavakoli, A. M., & Tehrani Setayesh, H. R. (2025). Examining Damages Arising from Damages in Iranian Law and the Convention on the International Sale of Goods. Legal Civilization, 8(23).
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahbobeh Bashiri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.