حدود مداخله دادرس در امور موضوعی در دادرسی مدنی

Abdollahi, M. (2015). The limits of the judge's authority in obtaining evidence in Iranian civil procedure. Contemporary Legal Studies Quarterly, 7(2), 55-82.

Al-Shahid al-Thani, Z. a.-D. Masalik al-Afham (Vol. 14). Islamic Publications.

Al-Tusi, M. i. H. (1986). Al-Khilaf (Vol. 6). Society of Seminary Teachers.

Cappelletti, M. (1970). Social and political aspects of civil procedure: Reforms and trends in Western and Eastern Europe. Michigan Law Review, 69(5), 847-901.

Damaska, M. (1973). Evidentiary barriers to conviction and two models of criminal procedure: A comparative study. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121(3), 506-589.

Damaska, M. (1986). The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Yale University Press.

Fazel Lankarani, M. (2005). Al-Qada wa al-Shahadat. Jurisprudential Center of the Pure Imams.

Goubau, D. (1996). Judicial activism in fact-finding: Limits and justifications. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 1(1), 23-44.

Jafaritabar, M. (2021). Judicial persuasion in the process of discovering factual matters in civil claims. Private Law Studies, 52(3), 31-56.

Jolowicz, J. A. (2000). On Civil Procedure. Cambridge University Press.

Katouzian, N. (2008). Civil Procedure: Introductory Course (Vol. 1). Mizan Publications.

Khoei, S. A. (1999). Mabani Takmilat al-Minhaj (Vol. 1). Imam al-Sadiq Institute.

Khomeini, R. Tahrir al-Wasilah (Vol. 2). Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Springer.

Makarem Shirazi, N. (2021). Al-Qada fi al-Fiqh al-Islami. Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib School.

Mohammadi, J. (2018). The adversarial principle and its role in limiting the judge's authority in factual matters. Private Law Research, 10(3), 65-92.

Mohseni, K. (2008). Judicial impartiality and fair trial. Judiciary Law Journal(64), 79-102.

Moradi, L. (2017). Searching for truth in light of jurisprudential rules and civil procedure. Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Research, 13(2), 45-72.

Mousavi Bojnourdi, S. M. (1998). Al-Qada fi al-Fiqh al-Muqaran. Dar al-Ulum.

Nicolson, D. (1994). Truth, proof and confessions in Scots law. The Modern Law Review, 57(5), 731-761.

Rahpik, M. J. (2010). The rule of necessity of judgment based on the judge's knowledge in Imamiyyah jurisprudence and Iranian law. Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, 6(2), 7-32.

Sanei, H. (2004). Civil Procedure in Light of Imamiyyah Jurisprudence (Vol. 1). Bustan-e Ketab.

Shams, A. (2019). Civil Procedure (Vol. 1). Derak.

Sharifi, M. (2014). Judicial security and the limits of the judge's initiative in obtaining evidence. Judiciary Law Journal(70), 45-74.

Soleimani, H. (2019). Limits of the judge's intervention in evaluating evidence in civil claims. Judiciary Law Quarterly(89), 103-132.

Taheri, A. (2013). Principles governing fair trial and their effect on the judge's role in discovering the truth. Public Law Research, 15(1), 91-120.

Taruffo, M. (2003). Rethinking the nature of the judicial process. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 1-28.

Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Erlbaum.

Twining, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.