Foundations of the Protection of Cultural, Literary, and Artistic Works and Remedies for Their Infringement in the Iranian Legal System

Authors

    Hooshang Abdollahzadeh * MA Student, Department of Private Law, Kashan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran. Hooshangab@yahoo.com
    Iraj Farshbaf Behnam MA Student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran

Keywords:

cultural and artistic works, Intellectual property , copyright, moral rights, material rights, compensation

Abstract

In today’s world, cultural, literary, and artistic works occupy a position far beyond that of mere artistic products; as manifestations of human creativity, cultural identity, and intellectual capital, they require specific legal protections. This article, employing a descriptive-analytical research method, investigates the theoretical foundations of the protection of such works within the Iranian legal system. It demonstrates that theories such as the personality theory, the labor theory, and the theory of promoting the dissemination of knowledge play fundamental roles in justifying and shaping the rules of intellectual property. Based on these foundations, the Iranian legislature, through laws such as the Law on the Protection of Authors, Composers, and Artists’ Rights (1969) and the Law on the Translation and Reproduction of Books, Periodicals, and Audio Works (1973), has endeavored to guarantee both the material and moral rights of creators. Subsequently, the article examines the methods of compensation for damages resulting from the infringement of these rights under the Iranian legal framework. These remedies include financial compensation, seizure and prevention of the dissemination of the infringing works, restoration of the previous condition, moral compensation, and criminal sanctions. Despite the legislature’s efforts, the article reveals that certain deficiencies—such as the lack of a coherent judicial precedent in the field of moral compensation, weaknesses in civil enforcement mechanisms, and the absence of specialized dispute resolution institutions—have posed serious challenges to the effective protection of cultural and literary works in Iran. In conclusion, the article presents proposals for reforming and enhancing the protection and compensation regime, aligned with international developments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansari, B. (2007). Requirements for Copyright Protection under Literary and Artistic Property Law. Legal Research Journal(45).

Barikloo, A. (2017). Civil Liability. Mizan Publishing.

Barikloo, A., & Nasr Abadi, M. (2016). Legal Enforcement of Copyright Infringement in Iranian and Common Law Systems. Comparative Law Quarterly, 1(101).

Bird, & Bird. (2016). Copyright Damages for Moral Prejudice. https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2016/uk/ip-and-it-law-bytes-may/copyright-damages-for-moral-prejudice

Fathi, M. J., & Karamati Mo'ez, H. (2024). Legal and Criminological Analysis of Apology for Moral Damages Arising from Crime. Applied Criminology Research, 2(5).

Fromer, J. C. (2009). Claiming Intellectual Property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 76(2), Article 3.

Hegel, F. (2001). Philosophy of Right. Batoche Books.

Hekmatnia, M. (2010). Civil Liability in Imamiyyah Jurisprudence: Foundations and Structure. Islamic Sciences and Culture Research Institute.

Hekmatnia, M., & Mohammad Isaee, T. (2004). Civil Liability Arising from Damage to Intellectual Property. Name-ye Mofid, 10(43).

Hekmatnia, M., & Movahedi Savuji, M. (2006). The Role of Theoretical Foundations in Understanding and Defining the Intellectual Property System. Islamic Law Quarterly, 2(8).

Himma, K. (2005). Justifying Intellectual Property Protection: Why the Interests of Content-Creators Usually Win Over Everyone Else’s. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.840584

Katouzian, N. (2007). Civil Law: Non-Contractual Obligations; Tort Liability (Vol. 1). University of Tehran Press.

Khedmatgozar, M. (2023). The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Mizan Legal Foundation.

Layiqi, G. (2002). Copyright in Advanced Industrial Countries. House of Books.

Netanel, N. W. (2008). Copyright’s Paradox. Oxford University Press.

Radin, M. J. (1982). Property and Personhood. Stanford Law Review, 34(5), 957-1015. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228541

Downloads

Published

2025-08-10

Submitted

2025-02-24

Revised

2025-06-02

Accepted

2025-06-10

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Abdollahzadeh, H., & Farshbaf Behnam, I. . (1404). Foundations of the Protection of Cultural, Literary, and Artistic Works and Remedies for Their Infringement in the Iranian Legal System. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-14. https://www.jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/223

Similar Articles

1-10 of 84

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.