Legal Analysis of the Arbitration Clause in International Oil Contracts with Emphasis on the Iranian Legal System

Authors

    Gholamhossein Asheghi * Master’s Student, Department of Jurisprudence and Law, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran st_gh.asheghi@urmia.ac.ir
    Salman Alipour Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Law, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
    Reza Nikkhah Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Law, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Keywords:

 Arbitration Clause, International Oil Contracts, Public Policy, National Sovereignty, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Abstract

International oil contracts, as one of the most significant instruments for the exploitation of hydrocarbon resources, play a fundamental role in the economies of oil- and gas-rich countries, particularly Iran. Due to the transnational nature of these contracts and the involvement of foreign parties, the determination of dispute settlement mechanisms is of paramount importance, and the arbitration clause has emerged as the most common mechanism for resolving disputes in this field. Nevertheless, the enforcement of such clauses within the Iranian legal system faces several challenges rooted in specific interpretations of national sovereignty over natural resources, the expansive interpretation of the concept of public policy, and the lack of harmony between domestic regulations and international standards. The objective of this study is to analyze the legal nature of the arbitration clause in international oil contracts and to examine the obstacles to its enforcement under Iranian law. The principal research question is: What is the legal nature of the arbitration clause in international oil contracts with emphasis on the Iranian legal system, and why does its enforcement face challenges despite existing legal capacities? The findings indicate that although Iranian laws, particularly the International Commercial Arbitration Act, possess the capacity to recognize and enforce arbitral awards in oil disputes, a restrictive interpretation of public policy, political sensitivities associated with natural resources, and the absence of a coherent judicial practice have reduced legal predictability. The conclusion of this article demonstrates that through the reform of certain legislative and judicial approaches, a narrower interpretation of public policy, and greater convergence with international standards, Iran’s position within the international arbitration system can be strengthened and the legal security of investment in the oil sector can be enhanced. This study employs a descriptive-analytical method and relies on library-based sources as well as the examination of arbitral and judicial practices to analyze the subject matter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariff Abd Ghadas, Z., & Karimsharif, S. (2014). Types and Features of International Petroleum Contracts. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 4(3).

Azizian, M. (2023). The Effect of Public Order on Arbitrability in Iranian Law and the New York Convention. Comparative Law Studies, 14(1), 369-388.

Betin, B. (2022). Lex Petrolea in International Arbitration: A Very English Dissent. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 15(4), 308.

Emejuru, A. C., Nzeribe, A., & Osondu, A. C. (2025). Stabilization Clauses and Their Effects on Energy Sustainability. African Journal of Management and Business Research, 18(1), 605-618.

Hassan, S., Amuda, Y. J., Dhali, M., & Mehar, S. M. (2023). Contract Structure of Production Sharing Agreement by International Oil Company in Exploration of Petroleum Resources in Developing Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(3), 7-14.

Heravian, F. (2015). The Effect of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources on Common Oil and Gas Contracts Payame Noor University, Tehran Province]. Tehran.

Johar, S. (2024). Substantive Law Governing Disputes in International Commercial Arbitration in the Absence of the Parties' Choice. Judicial Law Journal, 88(127), 59-92.

Kabirabadi, G., Mohammadi, A., Soltani, R., & Shahriari, A. (2020). Analysis of the Nature of Disputes Arising from Oil and Gas Contracts and Their Arbitration Requirements. Political Sociology of Iran, 3(4), 1051.

Kakavand, M. (2023). Challenge of Arbitrators: Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. Nahad.

Shah Heydari, F. (2024). The Status of Public Order and National Security in International Commercial Arbitration. Iranian Journal of International Relations, 1(3).

Vaziri, H. (2018). Defective Arbitration Clauses in International Commercial Contracts University of Shomal, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences]. Amol.

Waincymer, J. (2023). Much Ado About the Law of the Arbitration Agreement: Who Wants to Know and for What Legitimate Purpose? Journal of International Arbitration, 40(4).

Zare, M., & Salimi, M. (2018). The Legal Nature and Independence of the Arbitration Clause from the Main Contract from the Perspective of Judicial Practice. Private Law Studies, 48(3), 453.

Zharikov, A. (2022). The Concept of Lex Petrolea from a Dispute Resolution Perspective: When Further Development Is Not Possible. Global Energy Law and Sustainability, 3(1), 72-99.

Downloads

Published

2027-06-22

Submitted

2025-12-22

Revised

2026-04-21

Accepted

2026-04-28

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Asheghi, G., Alipour, S., & Nikkhah, R. (1406). Legal Analysis of the Arbitration Clause in International Oil Contracts with Emphasis on the Iranian Legal System. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-17. https://www.jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/550

Similar Articles

1-10 of 260

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.